Over the
past few years, in chance meetings, or in seminars and symposia, many
people working in the field of impact assessment have indicated their
interest in and the need for exchanges on related issues.
In particular,
at the annual meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment,
held in Montréal in 1989, many people active in the public sector
as regulators, in para-public corporations as promoters, with consulting
firms, or in universities agreed that it was time for Québec
to develop an association that would enable exchanges on environmental
evaluation and the use of impact assessment in the planning and decision-making
process.
It is acknowledged
that public participation, particularly in the form of public hearings
and formal public consultations, lie at the very heart impact assessment
and decision-making processes in modern, technologically-advanced and
democratically renewed societies.
These needs
have become more obvious with the application of the concept of sustainable
development, to resource management as well as to city planning. This
concept describes an integrated approach to economic, social and cultural
development and concerns regarding the preservation of the diversity
and future potential of resources. (sustainable development)
As method
of planning and management in the different sectors of human activity,
impact assessment will be increasingly used and embrace the assessment
of financial, economic, social, legislative, legal and biophysical impacts
as well as those concerning health risks and the safety of individuals
and groups. This will hold true not only for projects, but for new technologies,
and the development of policies and programs.
This is
why the association of individuals and professional exchanges must be
undertaken on such a broad base. The Québec association should
include professionals in all fields of impact assessment: whether they
be biologists, geographers, doctors, engineers, architects, economists,
administrators, etc.
Moreover,
it has often been recognized that, while the professionals in the various
fields of impact assessment could easily convince each other of the
necessity of impact assessment and agree on the ethical rules which
must prevail to insure its credibility and usefulness, these views of
insiders are not necessarily shared by decision-makers, administrators,
politicians and managers in other sectors. This is why it is important
that such an association be equally open to people interested in using
impact assessment in the decision making process, and not limited to
specialists and experts. Members can equally come from administrations,
or from the political sector or from special interest groups.
It is important
to emphasize an essential condition for the success of such an association:
it must avoid getting involved in assessments or criticisms of specific
projects, in order to remain effective as a dispassionate and peaceful
forum for exchanges between individuals who may often play different
roles within the same process, representing sometimes opposing organizational
interests. These exchanges must be based on the advancement of the impact
assessment discipline, the participation of the public and the integration
of these processes into the planning and decision making process in
the context of a non-conflictual approach.